![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() It’s hard to argue with the second part of the statement, although the first part makes sense only if the Senate can “get rid of” the unremarkable proposition that confirmations in presidential election years will usually slow more quickly and stop sooner than in other years. Grassley didn’t rule out further confirmations, because the rule “is fairly flexible.” Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) responded that the Senate should consider “getting rid of” the rule and “just. And the final confirmation vote of a district court nominee occurred in the fall of that year.” The current chair, Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) said during a May 19 Committee business meeting that “there’s been a lot of discussion and frankly, disagreement about, what it means, and when it goes into effect,” noting however that “uring the last four presidential election years, the last confirmation vote of a circuit court nominee occurred before the summer recess. His unwritten admonition holds that in presidential election years, the Senate should stop processing judicial nominations around the time of its summer recess, perhaps with limited exceptions for clearly non-controversial nominees. South Carolina’s Strom Thurmond chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee from 1981 to 1987. Today, it and other myths are obscuring the 114th Senate’s meager confirmation record. Both parties have invoked it over the last several decades. Like a bad penny, the “Thurmond Rule” is surfacing again in Senate debates over judicial confirmations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |